Skip to main content
Trademark Infringement Cease and Desist Letter

Free Trademark Infringement Cease and Desist Letter Forms

Protect your brand from confusingly similar marks, counterfeit goods, cybersquatting, and Amazon listing hijacking. Our attorney-reviewed Lanham Act template cites 15 U.S.C. § 1114 and § 1125, demands cessation and destruction, and preserves your right to enhanced damages and attorney fees in federal court.

4.9rating
1,718+created this week
Ready in 5–10 min
Free to create and preview. Download as PDF or Word.
Identifies infringing conduct specifically
Demand-to-stop language and deadline
Preserves litigation rights and evidence
PDF + Word formats ready
Portrait of Suna Gol

Written by

Suna Gol
Portrait of Anderson Hill

Fact-checked by

Anderson Hill
Portrait of Jonathan Alfonso

Legally reviewed by

Jonathan Alfonso

Last updated March 17, 2026

What Is a Trademark Infringement Cease and Desist Letter?

A trademark infringement cease and desist letter is a formal pre-litigation demand sent by a trademark owner (or their attorney) to a party that is using a mark identical or confusingly similar to the owner's registered or common-law trademark. The letter identifies the protected mark, describes the infringing use, cites the relevant provisions of the Lanham Act, demands that the infringing use stop, and sets a deadline for compliance before a federal lawsuit is filed.

Trademark rights are governed primarily by the federal Lanham Act, enacted in 1946 and codified at 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq. Section 32 (15 U.S.C. § 1114) protects registered marks against infringement, and Section 43(a) (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)) creates a broader federal cause of action for unregistered marks, false designation of origin, and false advertising. Section 43(c) (15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)) protects famous marks from dilution, and Section 43(d) (the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)) provides a cause of action against cybersquatters.

The core test for trademark infringement is likelihood of confusion: whether an ordinary consumer in the relevant market is likely to be confused about the source, sponsorship, or affiliation of goods or services bearing the allegedly infringing mark. Courts apply a multi-factor test (the specific factors vary by federal circuit, with the Sleekcraft, Polaroid, and DuPont factor tests being the most common) that examines the strength of the senior mark, the similarity of the marks, the similarity of the goods, the trade channels, buyer sophistication, actual confusion, intent, and the likelihood of expansion.

A cease and desist letter is the first step in almost every trademark enforcement campaign. The Lanham Act offers powerful remedies — injunctive relief, the infringer's profits, actual damages, enhanced damages up to three times actual damages for willful infringement, statutory damages of up to $200,000 per counterfeit mark ($2 million for willful counterfeiting), ACPA statutory damages of up to $100,000 per cybersquatted domain, and attorney fees in exceptional cases — and the threat of federal litigation often produces compliance without the need to file suit.

Asserts Your Mark

Puts the infringer on formal notice of your Lanham Act rights

Unlocks Enhanced Damages

Documents knowledge to prove willfulness and treble damages

Preserves Injunctions

Strengthens any later motion for a preliminary or permanent injunction

Form Preview

Cease and Desist — Trademark Infringement

Pursuant to the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114 & 1125

Section 1: Trademark Owner

Northstar Outfitters Co., LLC
6,214,887

Section 2: The Mark

Word mark: NORTHSTAR OUTFITTERS
Class: 025 (apparel) and 035 (retail services)
First use in commerce: June 2014
Registered: February 8, 2022

Section 3: Infringing Use

You have used the confusingly similar mark "Northstarr Outfitter" on Shopify at northstarroutfitter.example.com and on Amazon seller account A1B2C3...

Section 4: Demand

(1) Cease all use of the infringing mark; (2) destroy all inventory, packaging, and marketing materials; (3) transfer the domain; (4) account for profits...

Types of Trademark Letters

Brand Name Infringement

Unauthorized use of a word mark, company name, or brand identifier

Logo Infringement

Unauthorized reproduction of a registered logo or design mark

Counterfeit Goods

Sale of products bearing fake versions of a genuine trademark

Domain Name Squatting

Registration of confusingly similar domain names under the ACPA

Keyword Advertising

Competitor bidding on trademarked keywords in ways that cause confusion

Trade Dress

Copying of distinctive packaging, storefront design, or product appearance

Amazon Listing Hijacking

Unauthorized sellers attaching to or copying your branded listings

Business Name Conflict

A newer business adopting a confusingly similar corporate or DBA name

The Lanham Act at a Glance

§ 32 (15 U.S.C. § 1114)

Infringement of a federally registered mark; the primary cause of action for registered mark owners.

§ 43(a) (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a))

Federal unfair competition — covers unregistered marks, false designation of origin, and false advertising.

§ 43(c) (15 U.S.C. § 1125(c))

Federal Trademark Dilution Act — protects famous marks from blurring and tarnishment.

§ 43(d) (15 U.S.C. § 1125(d))

Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act — statutory damages up to $100,000 per bad-faith domain.

§ 34 (15 U.S.C. § 1116)

Injunctive relief including temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions.

§ 35 (15 U.S.C. § 1117)

Remedies: infringer's profits, damages, treble damages, attorney fees, statutory damages for counterfeiting.

§ 36 (15 U.S.C. § 1118)

Destruction of infringing articles in the possession of the defendant.

Likelihood of Confusion Factors

Federal courts apply multi-factor tests derived from cases like AMF Inc. v. Sleekcraft Boats (9th Cir. 1979) and Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Elecs. Corp. (2d Cir. 1961). The factors below are weighed together; no single factor is dispositive.

FactorInquiry
Strength of markDistinctive or generic? Registered? Famous?
Similarity of marksSight, sound, meaning, commercial impression
Similarity of goodsSame, related, or entirely different product categories?
Trade channelsSame retail outlets, same customer base?
Buyer sophisticationCasual consumer vs. sophisticated professional buyer
Actual confusionDocumented instances of customer confusion
Defendant intentEvidence of bad faith or copying
Line expansionLikelihood that the parties' product lines will overlap

How to Draft the Letter

Step 1: Confirm your rights

Verify your federal registration status at uspto.gov and document your first date of use in commerce.

Step 2: Document the infringement

Capture screenshots of the infringing mark, the URL, product listings, and any evidence of confusion.

Step 3: Analyze likelihood of confusion

Walk through the Sleekcraft/Polaroid factors honestly. Overreach invites a declaratory judgment action.

Step 4: Identify the infringer

Use WHOIS, state business records, and platform transparency tools to find the responsible party.

Step 5: Draft the letter

Cite your registration, describe the infringement, and demand specific remedial action.

Step 6: Set a deadline

Typically 10-30 days depending on the complexity of the required action.

Step 7: Preserve your position

Send by certified mail and email, keep all proofs of service, and reserve all rights.

Key Components

Trademark owner identification

Full legal entity name of the mark owner

Description of the mark

Word mark, stylized mark, or logo with image attached

Registration details

USPTO registration number, class, and date

Priority of use

Date of first use in commerce

Description of infringing use

URLs, product listings, dates, and sample images

Likelihood of confusion analysis

Brief explanation of why the uses are confusingly similar

Statutory citations

15 U.S.C. § 1114, § 1125(a), and others as applicable

Specific demands

Stop use, destroy inventory, transfer domain, account for profits

Compliance deadline

Typically 10-30 days

Reservation of rights

Explicit reservation of all legal remedies

Dilution and Famous Marks

Under § 43(c), the owner of a famousmark can sue to prevent uses that blur the distinctiveness of the mark or tarnish its reputation, even without proof of likelihood of confusion. Only truly famous marks qualify — the test is whether the mark is "widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source." Famous marks include names like Coca-Cola, Nike, Google, and McDonald's. Niche or regionally famous marks generally do not qualify. Dilution is a powerful supplemental claim for famous mark owners but is not available to most trademark holders.

Damages Under 15 U.S.C. § 1117

Infringer's profits

Disgorgement of the profits the infringer earned from the unauthorized use.

Actual damages

Lost sales, corrective advertising costs, and reputational harm.

Enhanced damages

Courts may increase damages up to three times actual damages for willful infringement.

Counterfeit statutory damages

$1,000 to $200,000 per counterfeit mark per type of goods; up to $2,000,000 for willful counterfeiting.

ACPA statutory damages

$1,000 to $100,000 per cybersquatted domain.

Attorney fees

Reasonable fees in exceptional cases under Octane Fitness standard.

Common Defenses to Trademark Claims

Fair use

Descriptive fair use and nominative fair use allow limited use of another's mark to describe goods, compare products, or refer to the mark holder.

First sale doctrine

Resale of genuine branded goods is generally not infringement.

Parody and commentary

First Amendment protection for criticism, parody, and artistic expression.

No likelihood of confusion

Different markets, different consumers, or different goods may negate the core element of the claim.

Laches and abandonment

Delay in enforcement or failure to police the mark can bar relief or lead to abandonment.

Sample Letter

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL AND EMAIL

April 7, 2026

Northstarr Outfitter
c/o Tomas Velasquez, Registered Agent
4412 Buckhead Avenue
Atlanta, GA 30305

Re: Trademark Infringement of U.S. Reg. No. 6,214,887 (NORTHSTAR OUTFITTERS)

Dear Mr. Velasquez,

This firm represents Northstar Outfitters Co., LLC ("Northstar"), owner of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 6,214,887 for the mark NORTHSTAR OUTFITTERS, registered in International Classes 025 and 035 for outdoor apparel and retail store services. Northstar has used this mark continuously in interstate commerce since June 2014.

It has come to our attention that your business is currently marketing and selling outdoor apparel under the mark "Northstarr Outfitter," including through the domain northstarroutfitter.example.com and Amazon seller account A1B2C3. Your use of the confusingly similar mark in direct competition with our client's goods constitutes trademark infringement under Section 32 of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1114) and unfair competition under Section 43(a) (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)).

The marks are virtually identical in sight, sound, and commercial impression. The goods are the same. The trade channels overlap. Consumer confusion is not merely likely, it is inevitable, and our client has already received three customer inquiries intended for your business.

Within twenty (20) days of receipt of this letter, you are demanded to: (1) immediately cease all use of the mark NORTHSTARR OUTFITTER or any confusingly similar variation; (2) transfer the domain northstarroutfitter.example.com to our client; (3) remove the infringing Amazon listings; (4) destroy all infringing inventory, packaging, and marketing materials; (5) provide a full accounting of revenues earned from the infringing use; and (6) confirm compliance in writing.

Should you fail to comply, our client is prepared to pursue all remedies available under federal law, including injunctive relief under 15 U.S.C. § 1116, disgorgement of profits and treble damages under § 1117, destruction of infringing articles under § 1118, cybersquatting statutory damages of up to $100,000 per domain under § 1125(d), and reasonable attorney fees in this exceptional case.

This letter is sent without prejudice and without waiver of any rights, all of which are expressly reserved.

Sincerely,

Counsel for Northstar Outfitters Co., LLC

Frequently Asked Questions

Official Resources

Ready when you are

Create your Trademark Infringement Cease and Desist Letter in under 10 minutes.

Answer a few questions and download a compliant, attorney-drafted document ready for your state.